Saturday 22 February 2014

LITHUANIAN


Lithuanian
Lithuanian is the most ancient living Indo-European language. It has many similarities with Slavic languages, but, unlike Russian, it uses the Latin alphabet. In 1864, the ruling Russian government banned the Lithuanian language, but it has since been restored as independent Lithuania's official language. Lithuanian is spoken by approximately three million people there and by an additional half million around the world. How did Lithuanians obtain books written in Lithuanian during Russian rule?
 

 

Thursday 20 February 2014

CONVERTING SOUND ENERGY INTO ELECTRICITY USING PIEZOELECTRIC MATERIAL

“There is definitely energy contained in that sound,” says David Cohen-Tanugi, vice 
president of the MIT Energy Club and a John S. Hennessy Fellow in MIT’s Materials Science and 
Engineering department. “But the density of the energy is very low, and there is no way to capture it 
all. You’d have to have obscenely loud, continuous noise for harvesting to be worthwhile.” Sound 
energy is the energy produced by sound vibrations as they travel through a specific medium. 
Speakers use electricity to generate sound waves and now by using zinc oxide, the main ingredient of 
calamine lotion, to do the reverse - convert sound waves into electricity. Piezoelectrics are materials 
capable of turning mechanical energy into electricity, and can be substances as simple as cane sugar, 
bones, or quartz. Much research in this field has been focused on transforming the movement of a 
person running, or even the impact of a bullet, into a small electrical current, but although these 
advanced applications are not yet available in consumer products, scientists have been using 
piezoelectric materials in environmental sensors and speakers for years. Piezoelectrics create an 
electrical charge under stress, and thus zinc oxide, the main ingredient of calamine lotion, was bent 
into a field of nanowires sandwiched between two electrodes. The researchers subjected the 
sandwich to sound waves of 100 decibels which produced an electrical current of about 50 millivolts. 
Passing trains and subways aren’t only loud, but their surroundings rattle and vibrate as they pass, 
and part of the thrill of a rock concert is feeling the whole auditorium shake. Piezo material 
converts mechanical strain into electric energy this property of piezo material could be used to 
make a device which would be able to sustainably convert the sound energy to electric energy as 
piezo materials convert sound energy to electric energy. Transducer is also used to convert 
Mechanical energy to electric energy i.e.it can convert sound energy to electric energy the simple 
e.g. of use of transducer to convert sound to electric and vice versa is in speakers, headset also it 
could be converted into electric energy. 

CONCEPT 
 
Suppose we create a very thin curtain like diphagram which will get fluctuated by the 
oscillation and pressure created by the sound wave and a conductor will be attached to it which will 
be placed between magnetic bars these fluctuation in the curtain will create a movement in conductor 
which will affect the magnetic field of the magnet this will generate motional emf and will generate 
voltage across it. As per faradays law generated emf is given by Generated voltage = Emf =velocity 
of conductor X magnetic field X length of conductor thus the oscillation created by the sound wave 
could be converted into electricity and as the frequency is high the movement will be fast due to it 
we will get appreciable amount of electric energy. 
Piezo electric materials are transducers its crystals could convert mechanical strain to 
electricity, the crystals are formed naturally e.g. quartz, bone, DNA whereas artificially ZnO, lithium 
niobatet Lead Metaniobate the sound energy could be converted into electricity using piezo electric 
material. Let us see the properties of piezo electric material. Certain single crystal materials exhibit 
the following phenomenon: when the crystal is mechanically strained, (here sound energy) or when 
the crystal is deformed by the application of an external stress, electric charges appear on the crystal 
surfaces; and when the direction of the strain reverses, the polarity of the electric charge is reversed. 
This is called the direct piezo electric effect, and the crystals that exhibit it are classed as 
piezoelectric crystal. 

First let’s understand concept to produce current. When coil of aluminum comes in between two 
magnets opposite polarity say P N pole, and some force is applied on coil to rotate on its axis it’ll 
produce magnetic field and due to electromagnet flux charge/current flows. Its shows that to produce current, force or pressure are required or can say force is a main key 
to produce current. This paper suggesting to utilizing sound vibration as an applied force to produce 
current. Piezo electric material has ability to convert mechanical stress into electricity. 

 
History of Piezoelectricity 

The first scientific publication describing the phenomenon, later termed as piezoelectricity, 
appeared in 1880. It was co-authored by Pierre and Jacques Curie, who were conducting a variety of 
experiments on a range of crystals at the time. In those experiments, they cataloged a number of 
crystals, such as tourmaline, quartz, topaz, cane sugar and Rochelle salt that displayed surface 
charges when they were mechanically stressed. 
Without any external stress Centers of charges coincide, charges are reciprocally cancelled 
and formed electrical neutral unit cell.  
Applied external stress Internal structure is deformed, separation of charge centers and dipoles are generated Poles inside material are mutually Cancelled and charge occurs on surface creates 
polarization on the surface of material. 
Mathematical modeling 
Piezoelectricity is the combination of the materials electrical behavior: 
D =ε E, And Hook’s laws = s T where D: electric displacement, ε: permittivity, 
E: electric field strength, S: strain, s: compliance, T: stress 
 
The coupled strain-voltage equation 
S = sET + dtE converse piezoelectric effect 
D= ε 
T
E + dT direct piezoelectric effect 
d ij , k = ∂Sij /∂Ek piezoelectric coefficient 
 
When a poled piezoelectric material mechanically strained it became electrically polarized, 
producing an electric charge on the surface of the material. 
 
Example to explain concept 
 A human walking, for example is a low frequency event that can be captured in the form of 
stress on a piezoelectric platform. A person walking across a room may complete 1-2 steps per 
second. Each step introduces a stress in the floor of the room, and the frequency of that alternating 
stress would be about 1-2 vibrations per second, and this waste vibration energy can be harvested. 
Vibrations per second are a measure of frequency, often stated in Hertz (Hz). One vibration per 
second is equal to 1 Hz. Two vibrations per second are equal to 2 Hz. The common United States 
household’s electrical circuit carries electricity oscillating at 60 cycles per second, or 60 Hz, which is 
evidenced by the low frequency buzz of an electric shaver. 
 To determine how much energy piezoelectric can produce, a few metrics need to be defined 
that will be useful for the discussion. The first metric is power. Power is defined in Watts (W), which 
is defined as units of energy per second. Power is an indication of how quickly energy can be 
delivered. A powerful air conditioner can cool a room quickly, whereas a weakly powered heater may 
require a long time to heat a room. Other examples include a solar panel which may be rated at 200 W 
in peak sunlight at noon in the middle of a summer. The second metric is energy. Energy is defined in 
many units. In standard units, energy is stated in Joules (J), but for electricity it is often most useful to 
define energy in terms of watt-hours (W-h), for example, how many watts are produced in an hour. In 
the examples above, the solar panel would produce 200 W-h from noon to 1 PM. The natural gas 
power plant would produce 200 million watt-hours (200 megawatt-hours, or MWh) in the same hour. 
Again, the two examples are different by a factor of one million. 
 One study used lead zirconate titanate (PZT) wafers and flexible, multilayer polyvinylidene 
fluoride (PVDF) films inside shoes to convert mechanical walking energy into usable electrical 
energy [1], [2]. This system has been proposed for mobile computing and was ultimately able to provide 
continuously 1.3 mW at 3 V when walking at a rate of 0.8 Hz. 
 
METHOD 1 
Suppose we create a very thin curtain like diphagram which will get fluctuated by the 
oscillation and pressure created by the sound wave and a conductor will be attached to it which will 
be placed between magnetic bars these fluctuation in the curtain will create a movement in conductor 
which will affect the magnetic field of the magnet this will generate motional emf and will generate 
voltage across it. As per faradays law generated emf is given by Generated voltage = Emf =velocity 
of conductor X magnetic field X length of conductor Thus the oscillation created by the sound wave 
could be converted into electricity and as the frequency is high the movement will be fast due to it 
we will get appreciable amount of electric energy. It would work similar as the working of turbine 
this type of device could be made but its limitation will be that it will be efficient only in the place where 
high decibel of sound is available, for example nuclear power plant, industries using huge and noisy 
machines.
 
METHOD 2 
In this method we could convert sound energy to heat energy as sound wave travel by 
oscillating the particles of the medium so when sound energy travel through the medium it will 
disturbs the particle of the medium these disturbance created by sound will be used to convert it into 
heat energy as when the particles of the medium will be pushed by the sound wave it will collides 
with adjacent particle of the medium this collision will result in production of heat energy the 
production of heat energy will be more in the denser medium so for more heat production we will 
need a material with very high density. This heat energy will be converted into electricity. 
 
METHOD 3 
Converting sound energy to electricity by piezo electric material (piezo electric materials are 
the crystal which convert mechanical strain to electric energy) device could be made using piezo 
electric material which will collect the sound wave which are travelling near it and that sound wave 
will be used to cause a strain due to pressure created by its oscillation in the piezo crystal and that 
will create the disturbance in its atoms resulting in the flow of electric charge on the surface of the 
crystal thus sound energy could be converted into electricity as the piezo electric material convert 
mechanical strain to electric energy. And thus this sound energy could be used to perform various 
tasks by converting it into useful electric energy



conclusion
 
• As sound has enormous amount energy with it, it could be used by converting it into electric 
energy for various purposes. Sound energy is a mechanical energy so according to law of 
thermodynamics mechanical energy could be converted into electric energy. 
• Sound energy could be converted by different methods: 
 
Method 1- By creating apparatus using curtain (diphagram) magnet and conductor. 
 
Methods 2- By converting Sound energy to heat energy and then heat energy to electric energy. 
 
Method 3- By using transducers such as piezo electric material which converts mechanical strain 
to electric energy and vice4 versa. 


FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM COLUMN JOINTS RETROFITTED WITH GFRP WRAPPING

Recent earthquakes have demonstrated that most of the reinforced concrete 
structures were severely damaged during earthquakes and they need major repair works. 
Beam column joints, being the lateral and vertical load resisting members in reinforced 
concrete structures are particularly vulnerable to failures during earthquakes. The existing 
reinforced concrete beam-column joints which are not designed as per code IS 
13920:1993 must be strengthened since they do not meet the ductility requirements. The 
finite element method (FEM) has become a staple for predicting and simulating the 
physical behavior of complex engineering systems. The commercial finite element 
analysis (FEA) programs have gained common acceptance among engineers in industry 
and researchers. The details of the finite element analysis of beam column joints 
retrofitted with glass fiber reinforced polymer sheets (GFRP) carried out using the 
package ANSYS are presented in this paper. Three exterior reinforced concrete beam 
column joint specimens were modeled using ANSYS package. The first specimen is the 
control specimen. This had reinforcement as per code IS 456:2000. The second specimen 
which is also the control specimen. This had reinforcement as per code IS 13920:1993. 
The third specimen had reinforcement as per code IS 456:2000 and was retrofitted with 
glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) sheets. During the analysis both the ends of 
column were hinged. Static load was applied at the free end of the cantilever beam up to a 
controlled load. The performance of the retrofitted beam-column joint was compared 
with the control specimens and the results are presented in this paper. 
Key words: Beam column joint, Retrofitting, FRP sheets. The techniques of using fiber sheets for strengthen the beam column joints have a number of favorable characteristics such as ease to install, immunity to corrosion and high strength. The simplest way to strengthen the joints is to wrap fiber sheets in the joint 
region in two orthogonal directions. Many fiber reinforced polymer sheets are available the market for strengthening reinforced concrete members .Glass fiber reinforced 
polymer sheets are commonly used for retrofitting the structural elements.

The beam column joint considered for analysis consists of a cantilever portion and 
column portion as shown in Figure 1.a and Figure 1.b. The column had a cross section of 
200 mm x 200 mm with an overall length of 1500 mm and the beam had a cross section 
of 200 mm x 200 mm and the length of the cantilevered portion was 600 mm. The control 
specimens were designated as C1 and C2. C1 had reinforcement as per code IS 456-2000 
and C2 had reinforcement as per code IS 13920-1993. The specimen retrofitted with glass 
reinforced polymer sheet was designated as C3 which had reinforcement as per code IS 
456-2000. The column portion was reinforced with 4 numbers of 12mm diameter Fe 415 
rods and the beam portion was reinforced with 2 numbers of 16 mm diameter Fe 415 rods 
each in the tension and compression zones. The lateral ties in the columns of the 
specimens C1 and C3 were 6 mm diameter Fe 250 bars with the spacing of 180 mm c/c 
as per code IS 456:2000, clause 26.5.3.2(c). Beam had vertical stirrups of 6 mm diameter 
Fe 250 bar at 120 mm c/c as per code IS 456:2000, clause 26.5.1.6. The development 
length of the tension and compression rods in beam were also provided as per clause 
26.2.1 of code IS 456:2000. For the specimen C2, the lateral ties in the columns consisted 
of 8 mm diameter Fe 415 bar at 75 mm c/c for the central distance of 1100 mm as per 
code IS 13920:1993, clause 7.4.6 and 6mm diameter Fe250 bars at 100 mm c/c for the 
remaining length of the column. Beams had vertical stirrups of 6 mm diameter Fe 250 bar 
at 40 mm c/c. up to a distance of 340 mm from the face of the column as per code IS 
13920:1993, clause 6.3.5 and 6 mm diameter Fe250 bar at 80 mm c/c for remaining 
length of the beam. The development length of the beam rods were also provided as per 
code IS 13920:1993, clause 6.2.5. M25 grade concrete was adopted. 13920:1993 
Meshing was done for both control and retrofitted specimens using ANSYS. Both ends of 
the column were hinged. The concrete was modeled using Solid 65 element. The 
reinforcement was modeled using Link 8 element. The wrapping was modeled using 
Solid 45 element. The static load was applied at the free end of the cantilever beam at a 
regular load interval of 5 kN for the control and retrofitted reinforced concrete beam 
column joint models. The performance of the retrofitted beam column joint specimen was 
compared with the control beam-column joint specimens

NON LINEAR MODELING OF THE BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS 
Non linear analysis was done for three beam column specimens using the 
software ANSYS. A transverse static was applied at the free end of the beam to develop a 
bending moment at the joint. The load was increased in steps till a controlled load of 22 

kN. The deflection at the free end of the cantilever beam was noted. The deflections of 

the specimen C1 were found to be 12.5 mm for the load of 15 kN, 35 mm for the load of 
20 kN, and 56 mm for the load of 22 kN. The same procedure was repeated for the 
specimen detailed as per code IS 13920-1993 and for the retrofitted specimen. Figure 3a, 
Figure 3b, and Figure 3c show the typical views of the deflected control and retrofitted 
specimens. Figure 4 shows the load deflection curve for the control and retrofitted 
specimens. Table 1 shows comparison between the deflections and energy absorption 
capacity of the control and retrofitted specimens. 

DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS 
 It can be found from the Table 1 that the deflection of the beam column joint 
specimen detailed as per code IS 13920-1993 is 19.64 % less than that of the specimen 
detailed as per code IS 456-2000 and deflection of the beam column joint specimen 
retrofitted with glass reinforced polymer sheet was 42.85 % less than that of the 
specimen detailed as per code IS 456-2000.The energy absorption capacity of the 
specimen beam column joint specimen detailed as per code IS 13920-1993 is 15.93 % 
more than that of the specimen detailed as per code IS 456-2000 and energy absorption 
capacity of the beam column joint specimen retrofitted with glass reinforced polymer 
sheet was 34.22 % more than that of the specimen detailed as per code IS 456-2000. 
CONCLUSIONS 
 Based on the ANSYS modeling and analysis carried out on the control and retrofitted beam 
column joint specimens using GFRP sheets, the following conclusions were drawn: 
• The deflection of the beam column joint specimen detailed as per code IS 13920-1993 
was found to be 19.64 % lower than that of the specimen detailed per code IS 456-
2000. 
• The deflection of the beam column joint specimen retrofitted with GFRP sheet reduced 
the deflection about 42.85 %.when compared with the deflection of specimen detailed 
as per code IS 456-2000. 
• The energy absorption capacity of the beam column joint specimen detailed as per code 
IS 13920-1993 was found to be 15.93 % higher than that of the specimen detailed per 
code IS 456-2000. 
• The energy absorption capacity of the beam column joint specimen retrofitted with 
GFRP sheet increased about 34.22 %.when compared with the energy absorption 
capacity of specimen detailed as per code IS 456-2000.